Sanitation District hampered by three member board

Julie Tacker


In 1984, the San Luis Obispo County Grand Jury recommended the South San Luis Obispo County Sanitation District add members to its three member board to allow for “a greater distribution of decision makers among the users of the system.” To date, nothing has changed.

The makeup of the three member board is dictated in the California Health and Safety Code; the presiding officer from each community is to sit as its representative on the sanitation district board of directors. Today, Mayor John Shoals of Grover Beach, Mayor Jim Hill of Arroyo Grande and Karen White, the President of the Oceano Community Services District, govern the sanitation district.

The sanitation district owns and maintains approximately 9 miles of sewer trunk line and treats and disposes waste through the 5 million gallon per day wastewater treatment plant located next to the Oceano Airport, in Oceano.

Ironically, Karen White lives in Halcyon; her home is served water from a well and uses a septic system for waste treatment. As a decision maker she has no “skin in the game” yet has equal say in district matters.

The breakdown among sanitation district ratepayers is dramatically skewed with Arroyo Grande hosting the majority of users, 17,252; Grover Beach, 13,067 and Oceano only 7,600. The sanitation district representatives have equal say in how the districts monies are spent, even though a clear majority of funds come from Arroyo Grande.

The recent political climate has put Arroyo Grande’s Mayor Jim Hill in a corner; the latest iteration of the bylaws requires a 2/3’s majority to get an item on an agenda. This violates the spirit of the Brown Act,

Mayor Hill has been shut down on countless requests to have matters important to his constituent’s agendized; including the $800,000 missing money question he raised months ago.

The idea of expanding the board to include more members has been toyed with in the past, but when the phrase “special legislation” was spoken — the subject was dropped. Special legislation is not scary or costly; the board should simply open the question up to the community for input and take the results to our Assemblyman Jordan Cunningham, to consider passing. Cunningham is eager to serve his constituents.

The biggest resistance so far has come from Oceano. Over the years its representatives have made it clear that because the sewer plant is within its boundaries they are more impacted by its presence and should have as much say as the larger communities. But, at the same time sing its praises for being a good neighbor over the last 50 years.

They can’t really have it both ways. Ideas on how to expand the board to include additional members include taking the agencies out of the equation and simply opening the board up to a district-wide election. Anyone who is a ratepayer would be eligible to serve.

Other ideas leave the presiding officers in place and add “at large” positions for election. Perhaps the District 3 and District 4 County Supervisors should serve as additional board members? Really any combination or hybrid should be considered. The real question lies with the people of the district, how do they want to be served?

Maybe, after all the wasted time and money, it may be time to dissolve the district and let the county manage it. It’s up to the tri-communities to decide.

The district is at a crossroads; recently severing ties with its administrator and superintendent. Perhaps it’s time for a full make over; new administration, new operation and new representation.

Please, be respectful of others. Attack ideas, not users. Personal insults, shill or troll accusations, hate speech, and other uncivil comments will be removed. The comments posted represent the opinion of the writer and do not represent the views or policies of the website.

3 Comments about “Sanitation District hampered by three member board”

  1. Otis says:

    Julie — the real expression in false political issues — nails the issue with the corruption in the Sanitation District.

  2. ckubel says:

    I agree it should be elected board members, not because they were appointed as a result of being elected in their respective cities or Oceano. You will never have fair representation of the rate payers as it currently stands. I am not being represented by my representative on the board, Mayor Hill, because the other two board members vote down anything that he tries to do to hold the district accountable for their actions. We can’t allow two board members who turn a blind eye to major problems that are happening, to get away with this anymore. Every rate payer should be alarmed at what is happening, and stand up and say “no more”, after all it is our money that the board is spending or decisions that are being made, without regard to how it affects us, because of the way the board is structured.

  3. KevinRice says:

    Elected would be great. But the voters usually don’t care about minor offices, and it would likely just be a parking spot for washed-up polits. Still, it would be an improvement. The opportunity would be there to get someone who really cares. Right now, only Mayor Jim Hill votes for the people’s interests.

    I could support two from each jurisdiction, or six overall. Maybe one from each jurisdiction and three at-large? Whatever.

    A big shortcoming is you know who you’re getting on the sanitation district when you elect a mayor in A.G. or Groover, but Oceano just passes around the football (since the board picks the president) and the public has no control.

Comments are closed.