U.S. Attorney General orders enforcement of federal marijuana law

Jeff Sessions

In the same week that legal sales of marijuana for recreational use began in California, United States Attorney General Jeff Sessions issued a memorandum ordering a “return to rule of law” and directing prosecutors to resume enforcing the federal government’s prohibition of pot.

The federal Controlled Substances Act of 1970 generally prohibits the cultivation, distribution and possession of marijuana. However, with states beginning to legalize marijuana, the Obama Administration issued guidance calling for federal prosecutors not to target pot businesses operating legally under state laws.

Sessions’ memo, issued Thursday, rescinds the Obama-era guidance and directs federal prosecutors to enforce the laws enacted by Congress and to follow well-established principles when pursuing marijuana-related cases, a Department of Justice press release states. Sessions said in a statement that the new policy empowers federal prosecutors to reduce violent crime, stem the tide of the drug crisis and dismantle criminal gangs.

“It is the mission of the Department of Justice to enforce the laws of the United States, and the previous issuance of guidance undermines the rule of law and the ability of our local, state, tribal and federal law enforcement partners to carry out this mission,” Sessions said. “Therefore, today’s memo on federal marijuana enforcement simply directs all U.S. attorneys to use previously established prosecutorial principles that provide them all necessary tools to disrupt criminal organizations, tackle the growing drug crisis and thwart violent crime across the country.”

Following Sessions’ order, another clash between the Trump Administration and the state of California appears imminent. California Attorney General Xavier Becerra responded to Sessions’ move by saying the state Department of Justice would protect California’s interests.

“In California, we decided it was best to regulate, not criminalize, cannabis. Unlike others, we embrace, not fear, change. After all, this is 2018 not the 20th Century,” Becerra said in a tweet. At the California Department of Justice we intend to vigorously enforce our state’s laws and protect our state’s interests.”

On Monday, California adults began legally purchasing marijuana for recreational use. The state is currently in the process of issuing retail licenses for pot businesses, and California is expected to have a multi-billion dollar marijuana market.

Please, be respectful of others. Attack ideas, not users. Personal insults, shill or troll accusations, hate speech, and other uncivil comments will be removed. The comments posted represent the opinion of the writer and do not represent the views or policies of the website.

2 Comments about “U.S. Attorney General orders enforcement of federal marijuana law”

  1. ArroyoGrande2000 says:

    “In California, we decided it was best to regulate, not criminalize” this is California Attorney General Xavier Becerra’s statement for many things, illegal entry, burglary, sexual harassment, and even murder, way to go.

    1. SLOBorn says:

      What AG Becerra actually said was ““In California, we decided it was best to regulate, not criminalize, cannabis. We intend to vigorously enforce our state’s laws and protect our state’s interests.”

      You left out “cannabis” in your post and then added “… illegal entry, burglary, sexual harassment, and even murder,…” which isn’t in AG Becerra statement at all. Where did all of that come from? Can you supply a link?

      Sessions orders also contained this phrase, one I find humorous at best and a down right lie not backed up by the facts at worst:

      “[Sessions] directs all U.S. attorneys to use previously established prosecutorial principles that provide them all the necessary tools to disrupt criminal organizations, tackle the growing drug crisis and thwart violent crime across our country.”

      Sound familiar? It should as it’s been the mantra of the failed “War on Drugs” for decades. What I think it is, is just another way that the current administration in Washington is trying to dismantle Obama’s legacy.

      Remember this: it costs about $35K a year to house someone in prison. Then ask yourself this question: “Is possession of a non-lethal “drug” worth the cost of incarceration on top of the billions of dollars spent investigating and prosecuting this victimless crime?”

Comments are closed.