Peter Keith’s plan to control Oceano Dunes dust

Peter Keith

Opinion by Peter Keith, an open letter to State Parks

I am the former mayor of Grover Beach, and current ‘charter member’ of the Technical Review Team (TRT), which reports to various state agencies including State Parks and the California Coastal Commission. The TRT has been engaged for the past eighteen years, endeavoring to establish a habitat conservation area, both within and areas surrounding the Oceano Dunes Off Road Vehicular Recreation Area, as well as mitigating  airborne sand particulate matter.

Without engaging in details that can be secured otherwise, I would very much like to rapidly get to the point of this communique. The subject is the California Oceano State Dunes off road vehicular recreational area. One of the most significant concerns affecting the entire off road dunes riding area and downwind communities is windblown particulate (microscopic sand) that is seen as a major health issue by those agencies monitoring the air load of particulate matter.

In addition, some science and measurements indicate windblown particulate is exacerbated by off road vehicular use within the riding area of the Oceano Dunes.

You are undoubtedly aware of the many, many attempts, by state parks to address the issue of windblown particulate and the continued failure to fully and successfully address this task; and of course the numerous law suits brought against the state by various agencies, public organizations and individuals to stop (or significantly reduce) off road recreation in the Oceano Dunes while identifying and eliminating the majority of airborne particulate and its sources.

In brief: 

I am endeavoring here, to present a workable plan to eliminate most wind driven sand particulate to protect both the downwind community while preserving the off road recreational area for its intended, state mandated, off road recreational uses.

The plan in general: 

A Phillips 66 oil refinery exists east of and adjacent to the dune recreational area of the dunes. That facility is licensed to issue approximately one half million gallons of water (treated to an industrial level) per day and discharged through an existing pipeline that empties into the Pacific Ocean some distance at sea. To better visualize that  amount of water flow think of the flow as 575 thousand gallons per day +/- or 300 gallons per minute!  That pipeline runs directly through the dune riding area and is quite easily accessed.

My simple proposal is to use that existing water to irrigate the dune riding area to a (percolated) depth sufficient to hold sand in place while recreational activities exist on the surface. Further use of the fore mentioned water source may be used to irrigate trees on the eastern edge of the dune riding area which would be planted by state parks and would further screen remaining airborne particulate from migrating into developed neighborhoods, thus eliminating or significantly reduce unhealthful airborne particulate

Please note:

The source of water used by Phillips 66 Refinery is a fresh water, on-site well. That water, treated to federal and state requirements after its usage at the refinery plant.

That post-water-usage meets all appropriate national industrial levels for discharge and meets national pollutant guidelines established by E.P.A. and subsequently by the state regional control board. The water elimination system has been approved by the 1976 federal clean water act and applies directly to waste water discharge from Phillips 66 Refinery sighted at the eastern edge of the Oceano Dunes Scape recreation areas.

Additional or co-operating alternative plan:

An airborne overhead, water misting system (using Phillips 66 discharge water) can be installed at the eastern edge of the dune riding areas. Thus, further suppressing airborne, wind driven sand particulate matter. That microscopic sand particulate would be ‘wetted’ while airborne becoming heavy, causing it to fall to the ground, eliminating further particulate migration.

Also, because of overhead water misting systems, dune plant growth would demonstrate encouraged newly sustainable growth. In addition, the planting of various tree types at the same eastern edge of the dunes would further screen drifting sand particulate, encourage tree sustainability, while also providing additional healthy habitat for a variety of birds and animals.

Conclusion:

The above plan may well end numerous lawsuits against the state regarding downwind human health issues relative to the dune recreational area. And of course, sustain usage of off road vehicular riding areas that have been chartered by the State of California for that specific recreational purpose.

The use of treated Phillips 66 Refinery fresh water for irrigation is economical (perhaps free of charge), immediately available, and safe even if the level of water treatment needs an upgrade in quality status!

This irrigation process, will secure usage of off road recreational dune areas by eliminating further health related outrage from downwind communities regarding airborne particulate matter and their related health concerns.

Without burdening you with further detail I would like to suggest a meeting either here at the Oceano Dunes Parks and Recreation offices or your office in Sacramento, as soon as possible, since the Calif. Coastal Commission appears to have lost confidence in State Parks ability to mitigate this urgent issue is on the cusp of permanently closing the state authorized, mandated off road vehicular activity in and on the Oceano Dunes.

An additional concept:

The community of Oceano in general, feels and publicly complains about being overwhelmed by the number of negative impacts on their community by recreational dune usage. Because Oceano is in fact the primary gateway community to the dunes, I and many, many others think some form of mitigation for the overabundance of usage of that gateway community is greatly overdue!

My suggestion would be to mitigate that negative situation within the community immediately. Accomplish this by dedicating one dollar of every dune entry fee to the Oceano Community through its official community administration offices. Subsequently, the dunes entry fee could be raised by one dollar or more to compensate for the one dollar loss to state parks.

Who is going to stop coming to the dunes to recreate? I would suggest few if any financial loss would be negligible or non-existent.

I believe the above concepts hold great possibilities and can be put in place quickly, affordably and most importantly, successfully.

The State of California, the surrounding communities and tourism, meaning all stake-holders could well see this proposal as a win-win.

I am looking forward to your return communication.

Peter Keith is a former Grover Beach mayor and two term council member. He played an active and leadership role in the cities name from Grover City to Grover Beach. He is an avid A.T.V., motorcycle  and dune buggy advocate and participant in off highway recreational use.

Peter is also a founding member (18 years) of the ‘Technical Review Team’ representing the local business communities interest in maintaining Oceano Dunes access for off road vehicles, the ‘Technical Review Team’ reports to various state agencies including the Coastal Commission regarding planned habitat, etc. In 1977, Peter was a member of the Grover citizens team which wrote the original ‘Local Coastal Plan,’ the first such plan to be certified by the State of California. Please note, Peter’s expressed views are not necessarily representative of those of the T.R.T. but rather are his personal views and  understandings. 

Peter is also the founder of the annual ‘Stone Soup Music Festival’ in Grover Beach (29 years). Peter has a strong and long standing interest in a wide variety of community events and non-profit organizations as a financial sponsor and/or executive board member. He can be reached at, pkeith@charter.net.

Please, be respectful of others. Attack ideas, not users. Personal insults, shill or troll accusations, hate speech, and other uncivil comments will be removed. The comments posted represent the opinion of the writer and do not represent the views or policies of the website.

One Comment about “Peter Keith’s plan to control Oceano Dunes dust”

  1. Cynthia says:

    Giving money to Oceano will not address the issues with our community being the doormat of the Dunes. Our main beach street, if it continues to be the main entrance for the ODSVRA, will still be lined with shuttered shops and vacant lots, as blowing sand and heavy truck and trailer traffic make it unpleasant for anyone not in a vehicle. The depression created by operation of the vehicle ramp and sand removal from the beach will continue to put our town at increased risk of tsunamis and sea level rise. And we will still lack a safe, vehicle-free beach on which to walk our dogs, let our children play, or simply spread a towel and soak up the sun like beachgoers everywhere else in California are able to do.
    State Parks OHMVRD needs to follow the Coastal Commission recommendation to perform an entrance study, considering the effects on our town and issues of environmental justice.

Leave a Reply